Skip Navigation

United Texas - Mobile
Free - On the App Store


United Texas - Mobile
Free - On the App Store

Payless Shoe Source pulled the ultimate stunt on shopping influencers and their followers — and the results still rankle. 

The prank was part of a viral advertising campaign dreamed up by marketing company DCX Growth Accelerator. The goal of the gimmick was to reclaim the bargain brand’s vanishing place in the world of affordable fashion. However, the event’s wild success is a hard wake-up call for shoppers everywhere. 

How it went down 

For the experiment, DCX rented a former Armani store and dressed it up like a designer-brand boutique. They chose the name Palessi, a blend of the word “Payless” and the Italian name “Alessi,” so the foreign association would hopefully evoke feelings of a genuine designer brand. To complete the trick, DCX created Bruno Palessi, a bogus Italian designer behind the brand, and even launched a Palessi website. 

They filled the luxury store with inexpensive Payless shoes, swapping the tags for Palessi labels and marking up prices up to 1,800 percent. Then they reached out to 60 fashion influencers — celebrated trendsetters to whom shoppers look to for fashion cues — and offered them compensation for attending their designer brand’s launch party in an upscale Los Angeles mall. 

The fashionistas believed they were shopping in a designer store and as a result, went wild over cheap Payless shoes. 

The influencers spent $3,000 on shoes within hours of the grand opening, paying up to $645 for shoes that normally retail between $19.99 and $39.99. 

At the end of the event, the company came clean — and shoppers were stunned. They got their money back, but were allowed to keep the shoes.

The social experiment succeeded in shifting consumer perception of the brand, and it also serves as a sobering reminder of how easily we can be duped by designers. 

What we pay for 

As the Palessi experiment proves, shoppers pay for their surroundings and for the packaging of products as much as they pay for the actual goods. 

We might preach about not judging books by their covers, but we do exactly that nearly every time we shop. 

As consumer behavior consultant Philip Graves says, consumers are not capable of determining the actual quality or value of goods. He explains: “The way that we evaluate things is through associations. If you put wine in a nice bottle, people like it more. If you package things up to look more premium, people will like it more.” 

In a word, branding is everything. If a product is packaged to look like it’s top-quality or designer, we’re that much more likely to pluck it off the shelves. And, if a store has the look of a posh designer boutique, we’re more willing to shell out big bucks for the privilege of shopping there. But, of course, the surroundings do not in any way indicate a higher-quality product. 

Michael R. Solomon, a marketing professor at Saint Joseph’s University, writes that consumers automatically link the following factors with excellent quality:

  • High prices
  • Opulent venues
  • Products from certain countries — including Italian shoes

It’s the snob appeal and the packaging that makes us believe a product is premium — not the product itself. 

How to beat the system 

If you pay for labels, you may not be any better than the fashionistas who were tricked by Payless. 

Are you paying for the shopping experience? For the designer or foreign label? For the high prices? 

The influencers who attended the Palessi event truly believed the shoes were higher quality. Essentially, you can buy clothing, shoes and accessories for 1,800 percent less than top brands that are virtually identical in style, quality and look! Of course, you won’t get the designer tag or trappings, but is it really worth paying hundreds of dollars for a name and fancier packaging? 

The next time you find yourself falling for an outrageously overpriced product, ask yourself what you’re truly paying for. You work hard for your money — don’t waste it on a name. 

Your Turn: Are you surprised by the results of the Palessi experiment? Why or why not? Share your thoughts on the social experiment in the comments below.

 Like what you read? Join our e-mail list!



  1. Irma Judith Lopez  |  

    You know what? I wouldn’t refer to Payless Shoes as “cheap”. Cheap shoes don’t hold up for years and usually don’t provide a comfortable fit. Not to mention their attractive design. Believe it or not, just last week I finally parted with a pair of sturdy, comfortable brown sandals that I have worn for years and years. Last year the thick sole developed a crack across the width of the left shoe, so I retired them to my closet. From time to time I’ve asked my local store if they would please bring them back so that I could buy another pair (or 2, or 3). Not every pair of shoes or sandals that I own come from Payless, but I have at least 4 pair in my closet, comfortable and good looking. Still, glad your experiment was performed. Lots of lessons to be learned. Thank you.

    1. Karla  |  

      Hi Ms. Lopez – I’m glad you enjoyed the post, and yes, the word “cheap” can be replaced with a better word, like “inexpensive”. Thanks for your comment!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.